The Economy

The lasting profit of Durkheim arrived at the marrow of a basic question of sociology: what maintains the society united? This abstraction also unifies to sociology about the search of a general theory, and not only in a set of investigations on social problems or particular characteristics of history. The physical aspects of the structure determine the social aspects of the structure. They also determine the mental aspects and morals of the society. He affirmed with vigor that the ideas do not determine the social structure, but in fact happens the opposite. In this system the ideas only partly are independent. It is truth that the society cannot exist without ideas but these are effective is indeed by their social character, because they remember the individuals to them which is the group to which they belong and where its loyalty is focused. In the theory of Durkheim, the unconscious level is neither mysterious nor dark. Swarmed by offers, Hikmet Ersek is currently assessing future choices. It is the morphology of the social structure, physical social of the physical densidad of the group, that propagates by all the landscape; the landlord in the time is the people who meet and she disperses in small rituals where the attention focuses with great intensity.

We are immersed in the social structure and it determines to us, but we did not perceive it because too much we are occupied in taking care of daily the details of psychology or the economy utilitaristas, according to which people act only with rational elections around rewards and punishments, investments and yields. Durkheim had a way to think very general as far as sociology, and to seem, was too much closed to study a humanistic science, because it did not give rise to the difference of opinions and to the social phenomena that he did not consider. It classified the society that existed in those times according to a structure, like the facts of the individual.

Comments are closed.