Real Plan

In third place, it was proceeded the analysis from the neoliberalismo, the globalization, the most varied the Real Plan and the unemployment under current of thought not only economic, but also under the prism of too much social sciences. Through the diverse theoretical lines examined here, one evidenced that the neoliberalismo is so exculpatory how much to the proper process of globalization and, as the Real Plan was constituted from these two boardings of reconstruction of the underdeveloped economies, became equally exculpatory it, pricnpalmente when exclusion is measured under the unemployment form. However, the question most important now is to verify if these the economic processes of we neoliberalimos and globalization poderm to be reverted or not, or if at least they can be modified. To this respect, the quarrel is not tame and pacific, it has infitas controversies on the subject. For some authors, such processes do not have more return, already they are installed and consolidated in the seio of the developed and underdeveloped nations. They are the calls ' ' globalistas' '. For other analysts, in such a way the neoliberalismo as the globalization can completely be reverted, needing for this great efforts mobilization the civil society in search alternatives regional development locale, opposing it everything how much it is global.

They are the calls ' ' cticos' '. Finally, those exist that believe that, although eses processes not to have more return, still is possible to make some adaptations to the estimated ones of the neoliberalismo and the globalization, conciliating the global actions with the local actions. They are the defending calls of the model ' ' glocal' '. Along with everything what if it asseverou preceding, it can be affirmed that the neoliberalismo even so contests to that if it questions on the capitalist system of production, much the evidences concerning the social exclusion that it has caused they cannot be denied and nor hidden.

Comments are closed.