Mechanical Engineering

Since, in fact, is very thin needles that are sufficiently great strength, and itching is a consequence of micro traumas, and if the fiber is capable of damaging skin, which can be talk about light? They have no nerve endings, and we do not feel as “safe” substitute with every breath makes our lungs into the sieve. In a question-answer forum Governor Cuomo was the first to reply. During the production, transportation, storage and construction of thousands of tons of insulation, “walks on Europe, billions of subtle and deadly needles flying in the air, and we run the risk at every step to acquire a portion of deadly needles. That can not be said about asbestos, which has a “breaking” strength of more steel, it is impossible not that pierce, but even cause the slightest injury, so it is flexible and soft, despite the strength. Construction is not the only industry where asbestos was used. Mechanical Engineering is also actively use asbestos, mostly in friction and brake pads, which naturally provides air venting of waste materials.

After the ban of asbestos in brake units of cars as a substitute for commonly used so-called “Metalosherst”, the name speaks for itself. It’s really metal, more precisely, a fiber derived from the metal thinner than a human hair is several times that during braking is released into the atmosphere. How many vehicle travels on the roads impossible to calculate, but they throw billions of needles. What you do not have a reason for tb? Where else but in Europe, the number of cars per square kilometer of area greater than all! And how much cars in the same Africa? Try yourself to draw an analogy. Asbestos was widely used in the construction of pipelines, it was replaced, and maybe we can expect outbreaks of gastric illness? It’s only asbestos! And how many new materials are introduced in the last few years as new substitutes used in food production, and how often during the presentation of goods used the trick, which only shows one side of the coin, we do not know. So that the assertion of safety for human health can be put into question, and the prohibition of the component or material is just a trick that can increase profits and has no hint of concern about health.

Comments are closed.